Say a country like Canada wants to protect its citizens from the dangers
of tobacco smoke by forcing cigarette companies to market their products
in plain packaging.
Sounds simplejust legislate it into practice.
"Not so fast," say the American tobacco companies. "Canada doesn't have
the right to interfere in the way we do business."
And they're right.
The court ruled, in fact, that the proposed ban on cigarette advertising
was an unjustifiable restriction on the freedom of expression clause in
the Charter of Rights.
Over the years, our national sovereignty has been diminished first by the
Charter of Rights, then the FTA and NAFTA. But they all pale beside the
coming MAI (Multinational Agreement on Investment).
When it comes to protecting our national economy and related social,
cultural and environmental matters, we're losing ground every day to the
grinding force of the multinational corporations. And their victory will be
complete when MAI comes to town.
Right now, the 29 richest countries are quietly negotiating the MAI in
Paris. Negotiations are expected to be completed in May, 1998. After that
the treaty must be approved by each nation's legislature.Like it or not, in a case that went to the Supreme Court, the Canadian
government was not allowed to pass a law compelling companies to sell
cigarettes in plain packages.
What is the
?
The prime objective of the MAI is to allow the movement of money across
international borders by imposing a new set of rules restricting countries
from using legislation, policies and programs seen as impediments to the
free flow of capital. In other words, it is a constitution for the largest
corporations to rule the world.
The huge multinational tobacco companies--like other corporations--can
already flex their muscles almost anywhere they want. But the coming MAI
will further enhance the political rights of corporations at the expense of
governments and their citizens.
Here are some of the ways the MAI will affect our economy once the
international corporations take up the rights granted them under the
treaty:
Under the new world economy of the MAI, ordinary people are asking what they can do to protect their political rights while stopping large corporations from gaining super citizenship status.
The MAI could prevent provincial governments from using procurement practices to support local industries. The MAI could prevent Quebec-based financial institutions like the Mouvement Desjardins from protecting themselves against a takeover by foreign financial institutions. The MAI would prevent provinces from prohibiting the ownership of farm lands by non-resident foreign citizens and laws that restrict foreign ownership of water and electrical utilities. The MAI would allow foreign corporations to force provinces to compete against one another in a race to the bottom because of lack of national standards for social programs and public services. The MAI would allow its rules to have supremacy over Canadian laws, federal or provincial. The only cases where Canadian laws would be relevant would be when they were consistent with the MAI rules. The MAI would allow global corporations like Exxon or Sony to have their political rights as investors constitutionally guaranteed and protected as if they were citizens of the host country. The MAI would allow transnational corporations to use the courts to ensure that Ottawa and the provinces fall into line with American constitutional law when it comes to regulating the economy and related social, cultural and environmental matters. In other words, the MAI has the makings of a dynamic constitutional force in its own right.
| Speak to your elected representatives: federal, provincial and local. Find out what they know about the MAI and what they are going to do about it. |
| Inform your community. Let people know what's at stake. |
| Write a letter of concern to your local newspaper. |
| Join the campaign. |

904-251 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 5J7