Ontario Health Coalition

ELECTION 2003

A Review & Analysis of the Three Major Party Positions
Re. the Future of Ontario’s Public Healthcare System

The mandate of the Ontario Health Coalition — and the desire of most Ontarians — is to protect and extend a quality, universal, one-tier, public healthcare system following the principles set out in the Canada Health Act. Over the last decade, the radical changes in Ontario’s health system - including cuts, restructuring and privatization - have had a serious impact on the system’s ability to deliver care according to these principles.

In the upcoming provincial election, the three major political parties are promoting healthcare policies that they tout as the path to an improved or saved system. But what do the parties’ plans mean for universal access? For out-of-pocket costs? For the provision of a comprehensive range of services under the public system? For democratic accountability?

We have taken a closer look at the parties’ platforms, their public statements, and their records. From these, we have developed the following analysis. We look at how their plans live up to our goals of: stopping the privatization & commercialization of healthcare; strengthening public Medicare following the principles set out in the Canada Health Act (universality, accessibility, comprehensiveness, portability, public funding); and improving the democracy & accountability in the system.

SUMMARY OF ONTARIO PARTY PLATFORMS ON HEALTHCARE

The platforms set out by the parties contain some critical differences that will impact millions of Ontarians’ health. In some areas, all parties have similar promises. These include plans to increase accreditation and supply of family doctors and nurses. The biggest differences lie in the question of ownership and control of the system, what will happen to seniors’ care in nursing homes and at home, and in accountability.

The increase in private for-profit ownership and control in Ontario’s health system has been growing steadily for at least a decade. More recently, it has grown by leaps and bounds with the introduction of private hospitals (P3s), private diagnostic clinics, private homecare, and increased privatization in long term care. Worldwide evidence shows that for-profit healthcare drives up costs through duplication, higher administrative costs, outrageous executive salaries, increased advertising, and profit-taking. Higher costs lead to a reduction in the scope of services that can be provided in the public health system and have a dramatic impact on its accessibility, comprehensiveness and universality. The protection and extension of public Medicare relies on the stopping of the privatization of the health system.

Access to publicly covered services has been compromised due to deep cuts to hospital budgets in the mid-1990s, poorly managed health restructuring and poor planning for human resources needs. Planning for population need, stabilizing and improving access to needed services, and ensuring publicly funded coverage are necessary to restore and strengthen public medicare in Ontario.

Massive changes have taken place in our health system over the last eight years, all with little or no public input or opportunity for debate. Privatization and government secrecy have hidden whole sectors from public scrutiny. Improved democracy, transparency and accountability are key to restoring confidence in and improving Ontario’s public health system.

Some of the key findings:

The Conservative Party:

The PCs have laid out a plan to dramatically increase private for-profit ownership in health services.

Their promises to increase access to family physicians are quite similar to those of the other parties.

Notably, the PCs have not promised to improve access or decrease out-of-pocket fees for seniors who are extremely angry about the erosion of care.

Unusually, their platform on health includes several law & order style promises that are not usually considered part of improving healthcare: an OHIP crackdown; street mental health teams that will be charged both with providing healthcare and with clearing the streets of homeless people — a dual role that is unlikely to work and would likely be in conflict with human rights and other personal protections; a threat to make the federal government pay for care for undefined illegal immigrants (refugees?) and others.

Overall, the Conservatives’ platform if implemented, would result in diminished scope of care provided under Medicare and would exacerbate inequalities for women, seniors and vulnerable populations. The big winners here are the for-profit nursing homes, for-profit diagnostic corporations, and companies that want to own private hospitals for profit.

The Liberal Party:

The Liberals have come out with a mixed approach to privatization. They are opposed to the for-profit hospitals and MRI clinics, promising to bring the clinics back into public ownership if elected. This platform also contains some clear promises to stabilize hospital budgets and re-open hospital beds. A key weakness is their lack of promise to replace private hospitals with public hospitals. Notably, the Liberals’ opposition to privatization is dropped when it comes to homecare.

On access to care for seniors, the Liberals are promising improved standards and accessibility. Although short on details, this is a major step in the right direction. However, it is not clear how this can be accomplished in the now-privatized home and long term care sectors without restoring public control.

On improving access to physicians and primary health care, the Liberals have outlined a plan for teams of practitioners that is more complete and supported than the Conservatives, but less than the NDP promise for full-range-service, democratically-controlled Community Health Centres. The fate of the current CHCs is not clear from this platform.

This plan, if implemented could improve access but risks being mired in high costs and impossible-to-enforce accountability if for-profit corporations continue to rule the homecare and long term care sectors and if they are allowed to privatize services in hospitals. A failure to stop the current for-profit hospitals risks a challenge under the free trade agreement that could open all hospitals to privatization. The financial plan for building new hospitals and a commitment to keep the services in hospitals public are major holes that the Liberals will have to contend with if elected.

The New Democratic Party:

This platform comes out strongly against the privatization and commercialization of healthcare.

One important unique feature is a commitment to build new Community Health Centres to improve access to frontline care.

On improving access and standards for seniors’ care in facilities and at home, this platform is short on details but provides a significant step in the right direction.

The platform also lacks details about stabilizing hospitals.

The promises for clear accountability and transparency and whistleblower protection would be a big improvement.

This platform, if implemented, would reduce the role of for-profit health providers in the healthcare system. It would make more efficient the delivery of homecare services to seniors and reduce the burden of care on seniors and women. Theclear promises to stop the for-profit hospitals and replace them with public hospitals in Brampton and Ottawa are significant. Despite some missing details on regulation of long term care and on hospital funding, this is a platform geared to improving accessibility and universality of the public system.

PLATFORM REVIEW

 

STOP FOR-PROFIT HEALTHCARE

The increase in private for-profit ownership and control in Ontario’s health system has been growing steadily for at least a decade. More recently, it has grown by leaps and bounds with the introduction of private hospitals (P3s), private diagnostic clinics, private homecare, and increased privatization in long term care. Worldwide evidence shows that for-profit healthcare drives up costs through duplication, higher administrative costs, outrageous executive salaries, increased advertising, and profit-taking. Higher costs lead to a reduction in the scope of services that can be provided in the public health system and have a dramatic impact on its accessibility, comprehensiveness and universality. The protection and extension of public Medicare relies on the stopping of the privatization of the health system.

Stop For-Profit (P3) Hospitals

Conservatives

Will create more for-profit (P3) hospitals. Will extend privatization in hospitals to a range of services including laundry, dietary, maintenance, ownership, management, patient records, laboratories, diagnostic clinics and others.

Liberals

Oppose for-profit P3 hospitals. No clear plan to fund the construction and redevelopment of hospitals publicly.

NDP

Oppose for-profit P3 hospitals. Have promised to build public hospitals in Ottawa and Brampton where the first P3s are proposed.

Stop for-profit diagnostic (MRI/CT clinics)

Conservatives

Will build more for profit MRI/CT clinics.

Liberals

Oppose for-profit MRI/CT clinics. Will return the recently built private clinics to the public system.

NDP

Oppose for-profit MRI/CT clinics. Will return the recently built private clinics to the public system.

Stop for-profit homecare

Conservatives

Will continue with for-profit homecare.

Liberals

Will continue with for-profit homecare.

NDP

Oppose for-profit homecare. Will return the privatizated homecare services to non-profit, public control.

STRENGTHEN PUBLIC MEDICARE

Access to publicly covered services has been compromised due to deep cuts to hospital budgets in the mid-1990s, poorly managed health restructuring and poor planning for human resources needs. Planning for population need, stabilizing and improving access to needed services, and ensuring publicly funded coverage are necessary to restore and strengthen public medicare in Ontario. We have identified some key "hot spot" health issues to assess the parties’ intentions as reviewed below.

Stop two-tier access to diagnostic scans & enhance capacity in public system

Conservatives

Have introduced a bigger second tier by allowing for-profit clinics to charge out-of-pocket and allow queue-jumping for so-called medically unnecessary scans. Will continue with privatized, two-tier clinics. No promise to provide operating funds for communities that have raised money themselves for public scanners.

Liberals

Support the recommendations of the Romanow Commission that call for putting all streams of people waiting for diagnostic scans onto the same waiting list and serving that waiting list according to need, not payment. Will pass a Commitment to Medicare Act to prohibit two-tier Medicare & commit to building capacity in the public system.

NDP

Support the recommendations of the Romanow Commission that call for putting all streams of people on waiting lists for diagnostic scans onto the same waiting list. Will stop two-tier access. Will enhance capacity in the public system. Will entrench public health care in law.

Improve access to homecare, cover homecare with the principles of the Canada Health Act, and restore coverage to the tens of thousands of frail & elderly Ontarians who have seen their personal support at home cut off in the last several rounds of budget cuts.

Conservatives

Have cut the accessibility of home support services to tens of thousands of Ontarians. 115, 000 patients were removed from care lists from 2001 —2003. There is no promise in their platform to restore access to these services for frail & elderly Ontarians.

Liberals

Promise new investment in homecare starting with care for frail seniors. Homecare will be available as long as the cost does not exceed the cost of a nursing home. No firm promise to bring homecare under the principles of the Canada Health Act (cited as a "long term vision" in the platform).

NDP

Promise to increase homecare hours. Promise to bring homecare & long term care under the principles of universality & accessibility in the Canada Health Act.

Roll-back the increase in out-of-pocket fees for nursing homes & improve public funding of long term care facilities

Conservatives

There is no promise to do this. Fees will continue to increase over next two years.

Liberals

Commit to a seniors’ strategy that will cancel the recent fee increase. No clear commitment on improving public funding in the platform but the party is on the record calling for improved funding.

NDP

Promise to cancel the fee increase and increase public funding & accountability. Commit to ensuring that increased funding goes to residents’ needs, not profit.

Improve standards and conditions in nursing homes by restoring minimum staffing levels and hours of care, and instating a rigorous nursing home inspection system

Conservatives

There is no promise in their platform to do this.

Liberals

Commit to implementing standards of care at undefined levels and providing regular inspections.

NDP

Commit to implementing standards of care at undefined levels and increasing personnel in facilities. There is no clear platform commitment to increasing inspections, but the party is on the record calling for regular, unannounced inspections.

Plan for the future to meet population need for healthcare workers

Conservatives

Deep cuts to hospital budgets (almost $1 billion) in the Conservatives’ first term in office, unstable funding and late announcements of hospital budgets have led to huge cuts in hospital staff & nurses, and an increasingly casualized (part time & temporary) workforce. Since the Conservatives were elected the number of Ontarians without access to a family physician has grown to an unprecedented 900,000. The party platform promises incentives for medical & nursing students to work in underserved areas, expansion of family health networks, and increased immigration of international physicians & nurses. The party reiterates promises to improve the predictability of funding for hospitals but leaves the level of funding in question as it will be based on factors such as the economy, federal funding, and performance. This leaves hospitals at risk for budget cuts just when they may need funding the most.

Liberals

Promise to increase medical & nursing school enrollment, make medical school tuition more affordable, provide incentives to choose family medicine, and help international physicians to practice here. Promise to create more full-time nursing and nurse practitioner positions. Promise to create 150 family health teams of physicians and other health professionals.

NDP

Promise to reduce medical school tuition, create more full-time nursing and nurse practitioner positions, and create more nurse-friendly environments. Promise to streamline the training and accreditation of international physicians. Promise to create 100 new Community Health Centres and expand existing CHCs. Promise to establish a permanent advisory council on health human resources to plan for personnel needs.

Promote non-profit community health centers (CHCs) with improved access to front-line medical care.

Conservatives

Since elected in the mid-1990s, Community Health Centre budgets have been frozen. There is no promise in their platform to create more centers or improve funding to them.

Liberals

Will create a system of support and incentive for family physicians to practice in care teams but do not commit to creating or improving CHCs with a full range of services and democratic community control.

NDP

Promise to build 100 new Community Health Centres and expand existing CHCs

Improve access to hospital services by providing adequate and stable funding and re-opening closed beds.

Conservatives

The massive hospital cuts brought in by the Conservatives led to the closure of approximately 9,000 critical, acute and chronic care beds and the lay off of approx 25,000 staff positions in hospitals. In the ensuing crisis, some beds were re-opened and hospitals attempted to attract back nurses and other staff who had been cut. Hospital funding is routinely announced late and is unpredictable, leading to casualization (more temporary & part time) workforce, and hospital debt. The Conservatives have promised to announce hospital budgets on time & provide multi-year funding. However, they have tied funding to economic performance, federal-provincial relations and hospital performance. This does not assure predictability of funding.

Liberals

Promise stable multi-year funding, a moratorium on emergency room closures, and a re-opening of 1,600 beds.

NDP

No clear promise on this in the party platform. However, the party is on record opposing the funding and bed cuts and criticizing the Conservatives’ late budget announcements.

Improve democratic control, transparency & accountability

Conservatives

Since elected, the Conservatives have promoted privatized services which restrict public access to information and remove democratic control. In 2001, they passed legislation wiping out community memberships and Boards for homecare, replacing them with political appointees. The Conservatives oppose Romanow’s recommended Health Council that would monitor and report on health spending. They propose an appointment of a Health Quality Auditor to see how provincial money is spent, but do not promise to disclose this information to the public or improve public access to information about health spending. Since elected, they have undertaken massive changes to the health system with little or no public consultation & input. There is no proposal to improve democratic control over the system.

Liberals

Promise to create an independent Health Standards Council to report on performance to Ontarians. Promise to give the Provincial Auditor authority to audit all health care agencies and deliverers. There is no clear promise to revoke the Conservatives’ legislation that wiped out community boards and memberships of Access Centres that govern homecare. However, the Liberals are on the record as opposing this legislation when it was passed.

NDP

Promise to restore community control over homecare & make funding in long term care transparent and accountable. Propose an independent Health Care Standards Commissioner to set standards of care, enforce standards and patient rights and report on what is happening in the health system. Promise a patients’ bill of rights and whistleblower protection for staff who report on poor management practices.


Ontario Health Coalition
15 Gervais Drive, Suite 305
Toronto, Ontario  M3C 1Y8
tel: 416-441-2502
fax: 416-441-4073
email: ohc@sympatico.ca


Click here to return to the OHC Election Page.