Who is doing this?
One company, Ballard Power Systems of Burnaby BC is committed to
providing fuel cells to all areas of potential demand. They currently
have relationships with car manufacturers (Daimler-Chrysler and Ford Motor Company) to develop clean efficient engines for the world's auto
industry, Ballard has a relationship with a company in Japan to provide stationary power to homes and offices.
Ballard also has a relationship with Coleman to provide portable energy for things like camping equipment.
For more information refer to Ballards' web site: www.ballard.com You can click here to find more links
As a city dweller, you can still do a lot. Most importantly, you can reduce your energy consumption. It may be difficult or impossible to erect a wind generator in your back yard, but you can install solar water heaters and solar panels.
Starting in the spring, you will be able to choose your electricity provider, and therefore will be able to purchase green energy. If you purchase green energy, be sure to verify the source of the electricity. You should be able to find out how the energy is produced, and where the generation sites are.
If you are connected to the grid (in other words, if you do not generate all of the electricity that you use), the energy restructuring will affect you. If you don't do anything, you will still be supplied with electricity, but you will notice changes in your bills. Each bill will have different categories for transmission, electricity useage, the "debt retirement charge" (0.7 cents per kWh, to pay off the nuclear debt), and other charges.
One action you could take is to change your electricity supplier to one which uses green energy...please see the section immediately above this one, "But I Live in the City...".
An excellent summary and explanation of the restructuring can be found at http://www.brantpower.on.ca/q-a.htm
Due to recent changes in the power industry, individuals have been offered new options (especially in Ontario). To thos who are currently connected to the local distribution system, two separate options have become available.
If one is already connected to the grid, and wishes to generate power up to their electrical needs from renewable sources, the net metering program is attractive. This program allows the homeowner to maintain their AC circuits and appliances, and to start their renewable energy program small and add to their system gradually as finances and circumstances allow. The net metering program lowers the demand on grid supplied electricity and at times allows one to feed back power onto the grid when generation exceeds usage. One is able to bank excess power for up to 12 months without any loss. The rules for generators below 50 kilowatts are simple (e.g. one is paid exactly what they are charged for any kilowatt hour), but larger producers can also be involved with more strict regulations.
A 48 volt system minimizes transformation losses; a digital meter that records electron flow in both directions is required; an inverter, a grid intertie device and an isolation switch are required for grid compatibility. If a battery bank is added, dependence upon the grid is minimized based upon the capacity of the storage bank.
If, however, anyone wishes to feed the grid directly, the Standard Offer Contract allows microproducers (up to 10 kW) and other mid-sized generators (up to 10 MW) to feed the distribution directly and be paid a premium based upon the type of generator used. None of this generated power supplies the home directly, which differs from the Net Metering Program. Individuals, co-operatives, and communities who wish to become electricity producers may find this 20 year contract attractive.
For more information contact the Ontario Sustainable Energy Association (OSEA) at 416-977-4441 or info at ontario-sea.org
The following website also has more information on Standard Offer Contracts, as well as other governmental information:
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs - Energy Opportunities
Rapid Phaseout in Germany will Save DM83 Billion
From World Information Service on Energy (WISE)
News Communique #530, May 26, 2000
The phaseout of nuclear energy and change towards renewable energy could save a lot of money, according to a study by the Flensburg University in Germany. Jobs at the nuclear sites can be maintained if investments are made in renewable energy plants which replace the operating nuclear reactors.
(530.5172) WISE Amsterdam - A study by the German Flensburg University concluded that a rapid phaseout of nuclear energy would result in huge financial benefits. The study "Chance Atomausstieg - Perspektiven für neue Arbeitsplatze an Atomstandorten" (Chance nuclear phaseout--perspectives for new jobs at nuclear sites) was conducted on request of Greenpeace Germany. Greenpeace wants to discuss the results with workers from nuclear reactors and local politicians at nuclear sites.
Employment does not have to decrease in case of a rapid closure of nuclear plants. About 24,500 new jobs are to be created if a change is made towards renewable energy by 2025. Although the emissions of carbon dioxide (C02) in the scenario will increase until 2005, after that year it will be reduced. According to the study. the cumulative C02 emissions until 2025 would even be 1086 million tons lower than with continued operation of nuclear reactors. The change to renewable energy would gain economic benefits as high as DM83 billion (US$37.4 billion), i.e., working out the renewable energy option would save this amount of money compared to the government-desired phaseout of nuclear energy by 2025. Costs are mainly saved because of a smaller amount of radioactive waste and avoidance of expensive upgrades of reactors. The study failed to include amounts of compensation claimed by nuclear reactor operators. The researchers state that the amount of DM1 billion(US$0.45 billion) per reactor could be paid from the savings made.
The researchers worked out employment scenarios for the Stade, Biblis and Isar nuclear reactor sites. Because of its connection to coastal waters and possibilities of transport, Stade would be a suitable site for the production of wind turbines and the construction of a gas-fired electricity plant. With this, 600 to 1,200 jobs could be created. At the moment, 350 people are working in the Stade nuclear plant.
The 750 jobs at the Biblis A and B reactors could be maintained if the electricity production is replaced by a gas-fired plant. The 650 jobs at lsar could almost be maintained with the construction of a factory for biomass facilities and a technology center for fuel cells, which would result in a total of 400 to 500 jobs.
The obligation of the Kyoto Protocol to reduce C02 emissions in Germany until 2010 by 21%, compared to 1990, could be met easily with the renewable energy scenario
Source: Strahlentelex (FRG), 4 May 2000.
Contact: Greenpeace Germany, Grosse Elbstrasse 39 39, D-22767 Hamburg, Germany
Tel: +49-40-306180; Fax: +49-40-30618100
Email: mail@greenpeace.de;
Internet: http://ww.greenpeace.de